AI Engineering Performance Reviews


Zen van Riel - Senior AI Engineer

Zen van Riel - Senior AI Engineer

Senior AI Engineer & Teacher

As an expert in Artificial Intelligence, specializing in LLMs, I love to teach others AI engineering best practices. With real experience in the field working at big tech, I aim to teach you how to be successful with AI from concept to production. My blog posts are generated from my own video content which is referenced at the end of the post.

When I rapidly progressed from junior to senior AI engineer at big tech, I discovered that technical skills alone weren’t enough. The engineers who advanced most quickly were those who could quantify and communicate the business impact of their implementations. This insight transformed my approach to performance reviews and accelerated my career progression.

The AI Impact Measurement Challenge

AI engineers face unique challenges when demonstrating their value during performance reviews:

Attribution Complexity: AI implementations often influence business outcomes indirectly, making it difficult to isolate their specific contribution from other factors.

Time-Delayed Benefits: Many AI solutions deliver compounding value over time rather than immediate impacts, creating a mismatch with typical review cycles.

Multidimensional Value: AI implementations frequently deliver value across several dimensions simultaneously (efficiency, quality, cost reduction), requiring more sophisticated measurement approaches.

Counterfactual Difficulty: Demonstrating what would have happened without your implementation often involves theoretical scenarios that are challenging to quantify.

These challenges explain why many talented engineers struggle to advance despite delivering valuable implementations – they simply haven’t developed the skill of translating technical work into business impact metrics.

The Core Value Measurement Framework

Through my experience navigating multiple performance cycles, I’ve developed a framework for measuring AI implementation impact across four key dimensions:

Efficiency Metrics: Quantifiable improvements in process speed, resource utilization, or throughput directly attributable to your implementation.

Quality Indicators: Measurable enhancements in output quality, error reduction, or consistency resulting from your AI solution.

Cost Impact: Demonstrable reductions in direct costs or resource requirements achieved through your implementation.

Revenue Influence: Measurable contributions to new or expanded revenue opportunities enabled by your AI capabilities.

The most compelling performance reviews include metrics from multiple dimensions, creating a comprehensive picture of implementation value.

Baseline Establishment Strategies

The foundation of effective impact measurement is rigorous baseline establishment:

Pre-Implementation Benchmarking: Systematically documenting key metrics before your implementation provides critical comparison points. Even basic before/after measurements significantly strengthen impact claims.

Control Group Comparison: When possible, comparing performance between groups using and not using your implementation creates powerful evidence of impact.

Historical Trend Analysis: Demonstrating deviations from established performance trends following your implementation provides context for improvements.

Counterfactual Modeling: Developing reasonable models of what would have happened without your implementation helps quantify avoided costs or problems.

These baseline approaches transform vague impact claims into credible, data-supported achievements that resonate during performance reviews.

Communication Strategies That Advance Careers

Even with solid metrics, how you communicate impact significantly affects how it’s perceived:

Business Language Translation: Converting technical achievements into business terminology makes them immediately relevant to decision-makers. For example, translating “reduced inference time by 200ms” into “enabled 15% more customer inquiries processed per hour.”

Stakeholder-Specific Framing: Tailoring impact descriptions to the priorities of different stakeholders demonstrates business awareness. Engineering leaders may value architectural elegance, while executives prioritize cost and revenue impacts.

Narrative Connection: Linking implementation outcomes to broader organizational objectives creates strategic relevance. Connecting your work to company-wide initiatives positions you as a strategic contributor rather than just a technical implementer.

Visualization Effectiveness: Creating visual representations of impact makes it more accessible and memorable during reviews. Simple before/after charts often communicate more effectively than detailed technical explanations.

These communication approaches transform raw metrics into compelling narratives about your value contribution.

The Impact Documentation System

Effective impact quantification requires systematic documentation throughout the implementation lifecycle:

Metric Selection Protocol: Identifying and agreeing on key metrics before beginning implementation work ensures you’re measuring what matters.

Incremental Tracking Discipline: Regularly recording progress against selected metrics creates a longitudinal record rather than scrambling to reconstruct impact at review time.

Feedback Collection Mechanism: Systematically gathering testimonials and feedback from users and stakeholders provides qualitative evidence that complements quantitative metrics.

Attribution Documentation: Maintaining records that link specific implementation features to observed outcomes helps establish causality rather than correlation.

This systematic approach transforms impact measurement from a stressful review-time activity to an ongoing practice that strengthens your position.

Beyond Technical Metrics

The most effective AI engineers include broader impact dimensions that extend beyond direct technical outcomes:

Knowledge Multiplication: Demonstrating how your implementations or documentation have helped others learn and become more effective quantifies your organizational influence.

Process Improvement: Showing how your approaches have enhanced how work gets done amplifies your perceived value beyond specific implementations.

Risk Reduction: Quantifying potential negative outcomes your implementations have prevented (security incidents, compliance issues, etc.) captures often-overlooked value dimensions.

Enablement Value: Measuring how your work has empowered others to achieve their objectives positions you as a force multiplier rather than just an individual contributor.

These broader metrics often separate those perceived as future leaders from those seen as merely technical specialists.

The ability to quantify and communicate implementation impact represents one of the most valuable career skills for AI engineers. By systematically measuring outcomes across multiple dimensions, establishing solid baselines, communicating in business language, and documenting impact throughout the implementation lifecycle, you transform performance reviews from tense evaluations to compelling demonstrations of your value contribution.

Take your understanding to the next level by joining a community of like-minded AI engineers. Become part of our growing community for implementation guides, hands-on practice, and collaborative learning opportunities that will transform these concepts into practical skills.